rFVIIIFc in treatment of haemophilia A from perspective of real clinical practice in three centers for treatment of haemophilia in the Czech Republic

Authors

  • Ester Zápotocká KDHO FN Motol Praha
  • Petr Smejkal Oddělení klinické hematologie, FN Brno a Katedra laboratorních metod LF MU, Brno
  • Světlana Köhlerová Oddělení dětské hematologie a biochemie, FN Brno
  • Gabriela Romanová Oddělení klinické hematologie, FN Brno a Katedra laboratorních metod LF MU, Brno

Keywords:

Haemophilia A, Biological half-life, SHL, rFVIIIFc, Bleeding control, Application number

Abstract

Introduction: In haemophilia A, prophylaxis with factor VIII with extended biological half-life (EHL) are gradually promoted over factors with standard half-life (SHL). One of representatives of EHL is efmoroctocog alfa - rFVIIIFc.

Objective: Retrospective evaluation of transition from SHL to rFVIIIFc treatment in conditions of routine clinical practice of three comprehensive haemophilia centers in the Czech Republic.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of medical records of patients with severe haemophilia A in two age groups (<12 and ≥12 years) previously treated with prophylactic SHL who were switched to rFVIIIFc. We evaluated bleeding control, injection frequency, factor consumption and trough levels achieved.

Results: 16 patients with average age of 6.1 years were included in the group <12 years, and 8 patients with an average age of 37.8 years were included in the  group ≥12 years. Group < 12 years: Compared with SHL, treatment with rFVIIIFc resulted in statistically significant reduction in the mean annual ABR bleeding rate (2.69 ± 2.24 vs. 0.69 ± 1.02; p= 0.0015) and the number of weekly applications ( 3 ± 0.45 vs. 2.21 ± 0.29; p= 0.0008). Proportion of patients without bleeding increased from 12.5% ​​to 62.5%. Factor consumption was similar and differences in mean trough levels (%) were not statistically significant (1.37 ± 0.85 vs. 1.66 ± 0.79). Group ≥ 12 years: Compared to SHL, treatment with rFVIIIFc led to statistically significant decrease in mean number of applications (2.62 ± 0.62 vs. 1.88 ± 0.13; p= 0.0223) and increase in mean trough levels (1 .75 ± 1.01 vs. 2.7 ± 1.28; p= 0.0223) with same factor consumption. Decrease in ABR was not statistically significant (mean 2.38 ± 1.51 vs. 1.13 ± 1.81; p= 0.0707). Proportion of patients without bleeding was 12.5% ​​for SHL and 62.5% for rFVIIIFc.

Conclusion: Switch from SHL treatment to rFVIIIFc was associated with better bleeding control and reduced application number regardless of age, while factor consumption remained unchanged. Benefits were particularly pronounced in children.

Published

2023-07-10