Ovarian cancer and multimodal prehabilitation options – a case study

Authors

  • Petra Sladkova Klinika rehabilitace FN Bulovka, Praha , Fakulta bio medicínského inženýrství, ČVUT, Kladno
  • Marie Ticha Klinika rehabilitace FN Bulovka, Praha , Fakulta bio medicínského inženýrství, ČVUT, Kladno
  • Michaela Svabenicka Klinika rehabilitace FN Bulovka, Praha , Fakulta bio medicínského inženýrství, ČVUT, Kladno
  • Katerina Kotrbova Klinika rehabilitace FN Bulovka, Praha , Fakulta bio medicínského inženýrství, ČVUT, Kladno
  • Anna Salyova Klinika rehabilitace FN Bulovka, Praha
  • Zuzana Vlastnikova Klinika rehabilitace FN Bulovka, Praha
  • Marketa Janatova Fakulta bio medicínského inženýrství, ČVUT, Kladno
  • Kristyna Hoidekrova 1. lékařská fakulta UK, Praha , Rehabilitační nemocnice Beroun, Beroun
  • Marketa Polkova Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika 1. LF UK a FN Bulovka, Praha
  • Michal Zikan Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika 1. LF UK a FN Bulovka, Praha
  • Tomas Brtnicky Gynekologicko-porodnická klinika 1. LF UK a FN Bulovka, Praha

Keywords:

oncogynecology, prehabilitation, quality of life, disability

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this case report is to present the impact of multimodal prehabilitation on the quality of life, cognitive performance, physical fitness, and nutritional status in a patient with advanced ovarian cancer. Methods: A 74-year-old woman with high grade serous ovarian carcinoma pT3bN1a was scheduled for radical surgery following three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. She underwent a three-week intensive multimodal prehabilitation program in a 4/7 regimen involving physiotherapy, occupational therapy, nutritional counselling, psychological support, and supervision by a rehabilitation physician. The effect was evaluated using functional and cognitive tests, stress and disability scales, and body composition analysis (InBody). Results: Improvement was observed across all major domains: reduction in disability (WHODAS 20 → 5%), enhancement of cognitive function (MoCA 22 → 25), decreased perceived stress (PSS-10 17 → 11), reduction in frailty (FI 3 → 1), and restoration of full independence in activities of daily living (Katz Index 6/6). Physical performance showed marked gains (6MWT +42 m, 5×SST −6.5 s, handgrip strength +4 kg), while pulmonary function tests confirmed improved ventilatory capacity (FVC, FEV1, PEF). Nutritional assessment indicated a reduced risk of malnutrition according to the MUST screening tool, although bioimpedance analysis demonstrated a mild increase in total body fat and visceral adipose tissue. Conclusion: Intensive multimodal prehabilitation positively influenced the patient’s psychosensory-motor potential, reduced disability, enhanced perioperative fitness, and confirmed its indispensable role in oncogynecology.

References

Downloads

Published

2026-03-12

Issue

Section

Gynecology and Obstetrics

Categories