Prenatal sonographic features and outcomes of radial ray defects – a 14 case series with a literature review

Authors

  • Gokhan Unver Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
  • Sercan Serin Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
  • Migraci Tosun Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
  • Prof. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
  • Mesut Onal Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perinatology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
  • Ummet Abur Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey
  • Engin Altundag Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey

Keywords:

antenatal care, early screening, first trimester screening, prenatal diagnosis, radial ray defect, radial ray malformation

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we aimed to present the demographic, ultrasonographic, genetic, obstetric, and postpartum results of 14 patients diagnosed with radial ray defects. Materials and methods: Fourteen patients diagnosed with radial ray defects. Non-development or hypoplasia of any preaxial part of the upper extremity on ultrasonography was considered a radial ray defect. Maternal age, gestational week at diagnosis, laterality of the radial ray defect, genetic results, presence of comorbid anomalies, termination status, and postpartum prognosis were obtained. Results: The range of maternal age at the time of diagnosis was 17–38 years and the gestational age ranged between 14–26 weeks. Four of the radial ray defects were bilateral, and ten were unilateral. Trisomy 18 was identified in two cases. Eight cases accepted the termination procedure. Three cases rejected termination and had spontaneous intrauterine death during pregnancy follow-up. One case was diagnosed with VACTERL association and died postpartum on the 13th day. One case was monitored due to Fanconi aplastic anemia and one case had amniotic band syndrome in etiology and lives with a prosthetic arm. Conclusion: The frequency of a radial ray defect accompanied by syndromic and congenital anomalies was high, and visualization of the radial bone or other preaxial bone structures on the 1st trimester fetal ultrasonography will ensure the diagnosis of a radial ray defect in early gestational weeks. In the case of a radial ray defect diagnosis, systemic organ screening should be performed with detailed ultrasonography and the necessary invasive procedure for karyotype examination should be advised to all families.

References

Downloads

Published

2026-03-12

Issue

Section

Gynecology and Obstetrics

Categories